It has potential for both power and economy... right or wrong?
@anonymous: Did not say this page sucks. It should give you at least 23 mpg on the highway (depending on driving habits, gearing, etc.) For the latest info on you favorite engine go to the Slant Six Forum. Also installed on these export 2-barrel engines was a slightly hotter camshaft (244° duration rather than 240°), and a distributor with modified advance curves. It's one of the most bullet-proof engines ever designed, its reliability is unmatched, and it has great potential for power and economy. Between late model year 1961 and early model year 1963, approximately 52,000 Although serviceable examples can still be found, the aluminum RG tended to undergo delamination between the iron cylinder liner and the surrounding aluminum. I value your feedback, so please leave some!I m in the process of building a healthy 318 to replace my 225 in my 78 W150.I have ordered 3 different sets of main bearings and they all come with a 1 1/4 rear main and i need onset that is 1 1/2. All the best! 225 Slant six. There are several slants making over 400 hp, … Better than the old single wrap.
Found a 1971 engine with auto tranny.any problems with a swap.I've been looking into mild performance upgrades and I love your page.
If you want to see it and want more info e-mail request to panevo@aol.com Ron from CaliforniaI have installed a 1985 Dodge Slant Six into my 1999 Dodge Ram 1500 Short Bed pickup.
27:30.
You are just not up to speed. Unfortunately they are no longer in business. The Aussie Speed 4-bbl intake is supposed to perform really nice but it's kind of pricey.I have a 1979 power wagon, with 225 six ,435 np 4 spd, 205 transfer case , 3.55 dana 70 rear, and 3.55 full time dana 40 front.
It will blow your mind! If you disagree then how about telling us what works for you instead of just throwing out a "this page sucks" comment? The basic design is rigid and sturdy, in part because the engine was designed to be made of either iron or aluminum. There is room for improvement over what Mopar gave us from the factory... right or wrong? I look to do twin deuces and split header with duel exhuast.In my two-door 1962 Valiant we installed a 225 engine with Offenhauser intake manifold for two carburetors, its performance is excellent.
You will get the latest info on your favorite engine as well as mine. Manufacturing costs were reduced by eliminating using two different blocks for the two different available sizes of slant-6 engine.
Browse, read, then join.
This configuration, similar to that found on marine G-engines beginning in 1965, consisted of an iron intake manifold with open-plenum 2-barrel carburetor mounting pad, a Carter BBD carburetor, and associated air cleaner, linkage and plumbing changes. Ryan Covalt 10,636 views. If you have one please let me know.
- Duration: 17:39. @anonymous: Really?
Offy products are not discontinued. Build it for speed, and it can put a lightweight car into the 12-second quarter-mile range.Whatever your goals, building and modifying a Slant Six is a lot of fun. If you want to go fast, the /6 can do that too, especially if you slap a turbo on it... you can really embarrass a lot of V8's. A 225 makes more torque than a 170 or 198... right or wrong?
along with respectable performance—as long as you're not expecting to win many drag races with it.The Slant 6 is perfect for A-Bodies. The engine...Slant 6.I've never been a Dodge fan, but they did a fantastic job designing and engineering this one!
Oh, and about the Slant Six Forum... if you want me to post a link then why don't you just ask me to put one up?If you want real slant six info not filled with misinformation go to the Slant Six Forum.The slant six was one of the most dependable and durable engines during its time. I like the Slant Six... right or wrong? There is a picture of one (with carbs) here:"Dual Deuce", "Twin Deuces", wouldn't that be (2) two-barrel carbs.
Introduced in 1959, it was known within Chrysler as the G-engine.It was a clean-sheet design that began production in 1959 at 170 cubic inches (2.8 L) and ended in 2000 at 225 cubic inches (3.7 L).
@glenbrook: At least it was:) Just realized I changed the intro picture...@anonymous: It's an Offenhauser dual 1 barrel intake that's been modified to take 2 Weber carburetors.We bought a utility body Dodge at an auction in the mid 70's.